BREAKING
Petrochemical

Controversial Allegation of Assault by Maroon Petrochemical CEO Against a Woman

An allegation of attempted assault by Amin Amraei, CEO of Maroon Petrochemical, against a woman during a business meeting has sparked controversy. Legal investigations and evidence presented by the complainant are still ongoing.

Controversial Allegation of Assault by Maroon Petrochemical CEO Against a Woman

A report on the allegation of "attempted indecent act with force, accompanied by threats and inducements" against Amin Amraei, CEO of Maroon Petrochemical Company, has been sent to the Fidus media. According to information provided by the complainant, this matter has been legally pursued and investigated in recent days.


Initial Acquaintance and Business Meetings

According to the complaint, the acquaintance between the parties began last year during a business meeting at the Tehran office of Maroon Petrochemical Company. The complainant claims that this meeting took place in the company's official environment and further discussions were postponed to another session. This process indicates a normal business relationship that gradually led to other issues.

The complainant alleges that during another invitation, she went to a building on Zafar Street in Tehran for a business meeting. According to the complaint, this building did not belong to Maroon Petrochemical Company and was owned by a private company. It is also claimed that this company was apparently introduced as a parts supplier, but the complainant's initial investigations suggest that the actual activities of the location require further examination by competent authorities.

Complainant's Allegations of Inappropriate Behavior

According to the statements made, after the complainant's arrival at the location, behavior outside the framework of a business meeting was exhibited by the accused. The complainant claimed that after resisting, she was initially faced with threats and then promises and inducements, eventually managing to leave the location around 7 PM. These allegations indicate a situation that the complainant perceived as assault.

There are issues in this matter, including the choice of a location outside the company's official office, the use of a property owned by a third party, the secluded nature of the meeting place, and the manner of invitation as evidence that the complainant views as indicative of a premeditated plan for assault. According to the information provided, the complainant's declared evidence includes an audio file, call and message records, her direct statements, and information regarding the meeting location.

🕒 آخرین به‌روزرسانی: 14. July 2026
⚖️ حق پاسخ محفوظ است. فیدوس این خبر را پس از دریافت پاسخ، اصلاحیه یا تکذیبیهٔ مستند، به‌روزرسانی می‌کند.
ارسال پاسخ رسمی / درخواست اصلاح / تکذیبیه
اطلاعات تماس شما محرمانه است و منتشر نمی‌شود. پاسخ پس از بررسی تحریریه ذیل خبر نمایش داده می‌شود.

دیدگاه‌ها

هنوز دیدگاهی ثبت نشده؛ اولین نفر باشید.

ثبت دیدگاه
دیدگاه شما پس از بررسی و تأیید تحریریه منتشر می‌شود.