BREAKING
Beyond Energy

255 Judicial Rows and 34 Ongoing Cases; Hadi Momenin's Record Before His Name Was Revealed in the Trustees' Case

Mohammad Hadi Momenin, one of the main intermediaries in the sale of Iranian oil during the sanctions period, has been involved in over a hundred financial and contractual legal cases in Tehran courts and has been accused by the media of failing to return about two billion dollars of oil revenues. This legal and financial record raises serious questions about the mechanism of credit assessment and selection of Iran's oil trustees.

255 Judicial Rows and 34 Ongoing Cases; Hadi Momenin's Record Before His Name Was Revealed in the Trustees' Case

An exclusive review of the full list of legal records provided about Mohammad Hadi Momenin, the trustee figure who has become a symbol of Iran's rent-seeking and corrupt economy these days, shows that his name was registered in 255 judicial rows between August 2011 and October 2026, a 15-year record, the majority of which relates to financial, commercial, contractual, and property disputes, and 34 of his cases are still registered as "ongoing" in the current output. Now that Momenin's name has been raised alongside several other intermediaries in the discussion of the sale of sanctioned Iranian oil, this record has raised a fundamental question about the mechanism of credit assessment and selection of oil trustees.

Momenin is not just an oil intermediary; he owns one of the most extensive sets of legal records registered in Tehran courts over the past fifteen years. A review of his legal cases shows that this individual, whom the media has introduced as one of the four main trustees for oil sales during the sanctions period, has been involved in over a hundred legal and financial cases, ranging from claims for payment and litigation costs to the obligation to formalize documents, annul transactions, property disputes, checks, insolvency, third-party objections, and enforcement of judgments.


These records start from 2011 and continue until 2026, precisely the period when Iran's oil sales structure was transferred to a network of intermediaries, cover companies, and offshore accounts due to sanctions. Simultaneously, Momenin's name has also appeared in investigative reports by international media, including two billion dollars of Iran's oil revenue that was not returned by him and circulated in a network known as "Shayan."

 

From Bank Debt to Oil Sales Network

 This record gains more public importance when placed alongside Momenin's credit status. Tasnim published the name of Mohammad Hadi Momenin with a debt of 743 billion tomans to Karafarin Bank in the list of major bank debtors. Interestingly, for the credit transfer of assets worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, credit history and repayment ability are usual risk assessment components.

 In September 2026, reports published inside Iran named Momenin alongside Ali Bayandarian, Rouhollah Razavi, and Hossein Shamkhani as four prominent figures in the oil sales trustees' network. Valiollah Bayati, a member of parliament, in this regard, called for clarification of the mechanism for selecting these individuals, sales prices, guarantees, and the method of transfer. In this discussion, about 72 million barrels of oil over a 60-day period were mentioned.


 Simultaneously, Iran International, quoting sources and documents it claims to possess, has alleged that Momenin has not returned about two billion dollars of oil revenues. This media outlet, in a separate report, also wrote that Momenin, at the request of NICO received a two-million-barrel shipment in China and then claimed 33 million dollars in compensation.


 

Dozens of Cases; A Repeating Pattern 

Over the past fifteen years, Mohammad Hadi Momenin has been involved in more than a hundred legal cases. The subjects of these cases are mainly financial and contractual: claims for payment and damages, obligation to formalize official documents, annulment and rescission of transactions, property disputes and contractual disagreements, checks and financial claims, insolvency from paying litigation costs, third-party objections, and suspension of enforcement operations. A significant portion of the older cases (2011 to 2016) has been closed, but since 2017, the volume of ongoing cases has increased. 


This trend shows that Momenin has not only been involved in high-risk transactions but also that his financial disputes have intensified in recent years. Momenin's cases are seen in almost all major branches of Tehran courts: branches 36, 9, 142, 47, 44, 79, 4, 1135, 141, and even branch 37 of the appellate court. This diversity of branches indicates the breadth of the types of lawsuits and the volume of his financial activities.


Simultaneously, his international commercial records are also verifiable: registration of the company Momenin Investment Group Ltd in the UK and registered citizenship of Dominican and a Master Franchise contract with Telepizza Spain and activity in Cellpack Ltd, which this commercial record, alongside domestic legal cases, creates a picture of a multilayered economic network that is active both inside and outside Iran.

In 2026, note that media reports named Momenin alongside three other trustees Ali Bayandarian, Rouhollah Razavi, and Hossein Shamkhani as the main intermediaries in the sale of Iranian oil. The crimes included: transferring tens of millions of barrels of oil, heavy discounts in sales, not returning about two billion dollars of oil revenue, connection with the "Shayan" network, a dispute over a two-million-barrel shipment in China, and a request for 33 million dollars in compensation for the tanker COVENIO.


An Opaque Structure and a Key Question

15 years of litigation history, 34 ongoing rows, repeated financial and commercial disputes, and major bank debt raise an important question: what credit and eligibility checks were conducted and what guarantees were in place for the return of money when entrusting large oil shipments and selling them on credit?

Momenin's case shows that the mechanism of oil trustees, which was formed as an emergency solution during the sanctions period, the government, to circumvent sanctions, entrusts public assets to opaque networks. The criteria for selecting individuals, guarantees, credit ceilings, and settlement methods are also part of the public responsibility of the same structure.When someone with dozens of financial cases, heavy bank debt, and extensive legal records becomes the main circle of the country's oil sales.

 The experience of Babak Zanjani showed that entrusting oil to opaque intermediaries without precise auditing can lead to multi-billion-dollar crises. Today, the case of Mohammad Hadi Momenin and similar networks is a sign of the repetition of the same pattern, a pattern whose consequences are not only economic but also political and social, adding to the misery of the Iranian people.

⚖️ حق پاسخ محفوظ است. فیدوس این خبر را پس از دریافت پاسخ، اصلاحیه یا تکذیبیهٔ مستند، به‌روزرسانی می‌کند.
ارسال پاسخ رسمی / درخواست اصلاح / تکذیبیه
اطلاعات تماس شما محرمانه است و منتشر نمی‌شود. پاسخ پس از بررسی تحریریه ذیل خبر نمایش داده می‌شود.

دیدگاه‌ها

هنوز دیدگاهی ثبت نشده؛ اولین نفر باشید.

ثبت دیدگاه
دیدگاه شما پس از بررسی و تأیید تحریریه منتشر می‌شود.