BREAKING
Beyond Energy

Biarjmand Cement; A Symbol of Resource Waste, Accumulated Foreign Debt, and the Destruction of Thousands of Shareholders' Capital

The Biarjmand Cement project, after 18 years, has still not reached production, leaving the capital of over 38,000 shareholders in limbo. The government is trying to revive the factory by extending the deadline for foreign debt repayment. This situation has not only turned into a financial crisis for investors but also requires government and economic institutions' intervention to save the project from the current deadlock.

Biarjmand Cement; A Symbol of Resource Waste, Accumulated Foreign Debt, and the Destruction of Thousands of Shareholders' Capital

A project that was supposed to alleviate deprivation from the east of Semnan has not reached production after nearly two decades. Now, the Islamic Republic government is trying to revive a factory by deferring its foreign debt, where the capital of more than 38 thousand shareholders is trapped..
 Eighteen years after thousands invested in the hope of establishing a large cement factory in Biarjmand, a project that was supposed to bring employment and development to the east of Semnan province has become one of the long-standing examples of industrial indecision in Iran..
The Biarjmand Cement factory, whose company was registered in 1385, halted after partial progress in its operations. During this time, foreign debts and bank penalties accumulated, the project was deprived of new financial resources, and the fate of more than 38 thousand shareholders became an issue that eventually involved the government, the Central Bank, the judiciary, and Shasta in the case..
The latest action by the Islamic Republic took place in Mordad 1405, when the Cabinet agreed to defer the company's foreign debt so that the debt would be removed from the overdue status and the project could once again secure financing..

 



A Factory That Was Supposed to Be a Development Engine 
Biarjmand is located in the east of Shahroud County, an area where the availability of raw mineral materials made the establishment of a cement factory industrially attractive..
The current plan was defined to produce 504 thousand tons of white cement annually. Officials say its launch could strengthen not only employment but also the region's mining industries, transportation, and exports. However, the gap between the paper capacity and the factory's reality is significant..
The Semnan judiciary previously announced that the project had about 45 percent physical progress and was halted after signing contracts with banks for equipment supply. Later reports spoke of 18 years of stagnation..
In 1404, the factory's capacity was announced as 700 thousand tons, while the latest government report considers its capacity to be 504 thousand tons of white cement. This statistical discrepancy is also part of the ambiguities left by the project's long history..

 


38 Thousand Shareholders and an Accumulated Debt
The social dimensions of the case become clearer when considering the number of its investors. According to official statistics, more than 38 thousand shareholders have invested in this company. Judicial officials have also acknowledged that the initial capital was raised from the public, and the ongoing uncertainty has caused shareholder dissatisfaction..
Meanwhile, the project used bank facilities and foreign resources to purchase equipment and implement the plan, but the factory did not become operational. The result was a financial cycle: a project without operational income had to repay its obligations, debts matured, bank penalties increased, and these debts limited the ability to receive new resources to complete the factory..
The governor of Semnan now officially states that the factory's non-completion has led to the accumulation of foreign debts and bank penalties, putting thousands of shareholders' capital at risk..
 
The Judiciary and Shasta's Involvement
The Biarjmand cement crisis eventually went beyond a private company. The judiciary entered the case years ago, and in 1404, the first deputy of the judiciary, government representatives, banks, Shasta, and shareholders gathered to examine the company's problems..
In that meeting, the issues of rial facilities, foreign commitments, and company debts were raised. The first deputy of the judiciary emphasized that the capital came from the people and dissatisfaction has arisen..
His remarks revealed another point: Shasta has entered to save the project. This judicial official stressed that Shasta must provide a plan, commitment, and guarantee to complete the factory. Thus, a project that began with public investment, after nearly two decades, relied on one of the largest economic holdings affiliated with the Social Security Organization to escape the deadlock..

 


The Government Deferred the Debt
The last link in this chain was formed in the summer of 1405. After reviewing the case in the government's economic commission and meetings with the first vice president, the Ministry of Economy, the Central Bank, the Planning and Budget Organization, and the judiciary, the Cabinet agreed to defer the foreign debt..
According to the new resolution, the period for using the facilities is extended until the second of Esfand 1407, and the deadline for foreign debt repayment is extended until the second of Shahrivar 1411. This decision can reduce banking pressure but does not eliminate the debt, postponing its payment to the future so that the project has the opportunity to complete and generate income..
 
Questions That Remain After 18 Years
Now, an image of a long managerial failure is presented, voiding people's capital: the capital of tens of thousands was attracted, bank and foreign facilities were received, the factory did not reach production, debt and penalties accumulated, and eventually, several governmental institutions intervened to save the project..
Now, the issue of the exact amount of capital attracted and spent over the years, the main amount of foreign and rial facilities, equipment purchase contracts, the cost of the project's 18-year halt, and the responsibility of managers who made decisions in different periods still require public transparency..
The Islamic Republic government says it has untied the main knot of the project by deferring the debt, but for the 38 thousand shareholders who have been waiting for nearly two decades, the fundamental question remains: how did a project intended to turn people's capital into a factory, employment, and production first reach debt and bank penalties and then require government, judiciary, and Shasta intervention to save itself?

⚖️ حق پاسخ محفوظ است. فیدوس این خبر را پس از دریافت پاسخ، اصلاحیه یا تکذیبیهٔ مستند، به‌روزرسانی می‌کند.
ارسال پاسخ رسمی / درخواست اصلاح / تکذیبیه
اطلاعات تماس شما محرمانه است و منتشر نمی‌شود. پاسخ پس از بررسی تحریریه ذیل خبر نمایش داده می‌شود.

دیدگاه‌ها

هنوز دیدگاهی ثبت نشده؛ اولین نفر باشید.

ثبت دیدگاه
دیدگاه شما پس از بررسی و تأیید تحریریه منتشر می‌شود.